Women-Drivers Blog
      By Anne Fleming, Car Buying Advocate
 

Compare car insurance quotes online to see how much you save

Research and find used cars at AutoMallUSA

Frugal Shopper: Women Prefer Practical, Frugal Cars, Men Don't?

by AnneFleming 16. June 2010 01:41
Original article at thecarconnection.com

2010 Volkswagen New Beetle Coupe

2010 Nissan Rogue

2010 Volvo S40When it comes time to purchase a car, men look for bold design statements, sexy sheetmetal, and scorching performance while women—well, women want something practical, economical, and safe, right?

You'd think times would have changed, but it appears not. The pricing intelligence firm TrueCar recently crunched the data—looking at vehicle registrations rather than the purchaser information, to eliminate the idea of household decision-making, and the survey says that women overwhelmingly prefer practical cars and small cars.

Kia ranked highest for female registrations, with nearly 46 percent of female vehicle registrations. Suzuki and MINI both ranked around 44 percent. TrueCar says that safety and value ranked high for all ten of the ten brands with a female ratio over 42 percent, which included Volvo, Subaru, and Hyundai.

Price and value seemed especially important, judging from those top ten brands. Other than for MINI and Subaru, all of these most popular brands with women had a discount of between five and ten percent off MSRP. In tenth place with women, Mitsubishi vehicles were discounted 10.1 percent from MSRP, on average, while 41.5 percent of them were registered to women.

No single brand has more female buyers than male buyers.

Exotic cars and exclusive ultraluxury brands are almost exclusively registered by men. TrueCar found that zero percent of Bugattis were bought by women, while Ferrari, Lamborghini, Tesla, and Aston Martin followed—all with less than ten percent. Specialty sports-car maker Lotus ranked just after these brands, with only ten percent purchased by women.

On a make-model basis, several truck models from GMC, Dodge, and Hummer also ranked near the top among vehicles that were mostly purchased by men.

2010 Hyundai Tucson2010 Volkswagen EosAlso looking at individual models, a considerable number had female registrations over 50 percent—though there's no comparison with the manly models. The model with the highest level, the Volkswagen New Beetle, has more than 56 percent female registrations. It's followed by the Nissan Rogue, Hyundai Tucson, Volkswagen Eos, and Volvo S40. There's definitely more of a story here as three of these models can be convertibles.

Among models popular with women, most were significantly discounted; three models on the top-ten list by model—the Nissan Rogue, the Volvo S40, and the Nissan Sentra—were discounted more than ten percent.

TrueCar's study figures more than 13 million vehicle registrations over the past two years. Average vehicle discounts were calculated using the firm's database of millions of vehicle sales transactions.

Why the do we have such gender differences in vehicles, and why does the frugal side appeal more to women? There's definitely more than the mom factor here, and the answers are deeper than a blog post can adequately cover. Take a look below at the top ten brands registered to women, and let us know what you think.

 

Make

 

% of Female Registration

% Discount off MSRP

KIA

 

45.8%

8.3%

SUZUKI

 

44.2%

9.5%

MINI

 

43.9%

3.1%

SUBARU

 

43.2%

4.0%

NISSAN

 

43.1%

9.6%

HYUNDAI

 

43.0%

8.3%

HONDA

 

42.8%

7.8%

VOLVO

 

42.4%

8.2%

LEXUS

 

42.3%

7.2%

MITSUBISHI

 

41.5%

10.1%

[TrueCar]


This story originally appeared at The Car Connection


Read more: http://www.pittsburghpostgazette.com/pg/10163/1065249-185.stm#ixzz0r1kAdQ00

Tags: , ,

Fueleconomy.gov's Most Fuel-Efficient Cars in America: 1984 - 2010

by AnneFleming 10. June 2010 10:08
 

Fueleconomy.gov has released two new top ten lists to help consumers purchase a fuel-efficient vehicle (http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/topten.jsp). Unlike other top ten lists that are limited to current model year vehicles, these new lists draw from twenty-six years of EPA and real-world fuel economy data, making them useful for consumers considering a new or used gas miser:

 
  1. Fueleconomy.gov’s Top Ten EPA-Rated Fuel Sippers (1984 to present)
  2. Fueleconomy.gov’s Top Ten Real-World Fuel Sippers (1984 to present)
 The first list shows the most fuel efficient vehicles based on EPA fuel economy ratings, while the second list shows the most fuel efficient vehicles based on fuel economy estimates reported by fueleconomy.gov’s “Your MPG” members—ten members must provide estimates for a vehicle’s real-world mpg to be included in the list, and the list is updated weekly as new data are submitted from members. 

It’s no surprise that hybrids top both lists, but it may come as a surprise that more than half of the vehicles on each list are not hybrids. Several small cars from the 1980s and 1990s fare well on both lists, and three diesel vehicles make the list based on driver-reported mpg.

 

A quick glance at the two lists also shows some interesting differences between the EPA estimates and the gas mileage reported by actual drivers. Several vehicles on the real-world list significantly outperformed EPA estimates. 2004-06 Honda Insight drivers averaged about 18 mpg better than the EPA estimate (70.4 mpg vs. 52 mpg), and all three diesel vehicles showed more than a 21-percent improvement in real-world driving over laboratory-based estimates. On the other hand, the average driver-reported estimates for some vehicles, such as the 2010 Toyota Prius, were much closer to the EPA ratings.

 

Please stay tuned as fueleconomy.gov will release more Top Ten lists in the near future.

  Fueleconomy.gov’s Top Ten EPA-Rated Fuel Sippers (1984 to present)
1.   Honda Insight Model Year 2000 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 53(City: 49  Highway: 61)
2.   Toyota Prius Model Year 2010 4 cyl, 1.8L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Combined: 50(City: 51  Highway: 48)
3.   Chevrolet Sprint ER Model Year 1986 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 48(City: 44  Highway: 53)
4.   Geo Metro XFI Model Year 1990-1994 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 47(City: 43  Highway: 52)
5.   Honda Civic Coupe HF Model Years 1986-1987 4 cyl, 1.5L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 46(City: 42  Highway: 51)
6.   Honda Civic HB VX Model Years 1994-1995 4 cyl, 1.5L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 43(City: 39  Highway: 50)
7.   Honda Civic Hybrid Model Years 2006-20104 cyl, 1.3L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Combined: 42(City: 40  Highway: 45)
8.   Honda Insight Model Year 20104 cyl, 1.3L, Auto(AV-S7), Regular Gasoline Combined: 41(City: 40  Highway: 43)
9.   Toyota Prius Model Years 2001-20034 cyl, 1.5L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline Combined: 41(City: 42  Highway: 41)
10.   Chevrolet Sprint Model Year 19893 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline Combined: 41(City: 38  Highway: 45)
  Suzuki Swift Model Year 19893 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline
Vehicles are ranked based on EPA's unrounded combined rating. In the event of a tie, multiple vehicles may share the same ranking. Only the most efficient configuration of a particular model is presented for a given rank—variants of a ranked model are listed as "similar models" if they would have otherwise made the list. Models classified under different EPA size classes, however, are ranked separately.  Fueleconomy.gov’s Top Ten Real-World Fuel Sippers (1984 to present)
1.   Honda Insight Model Years 2004-2006 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline User Average: 70.4(11 vehicles) EPA Combined: 52
2.   Honda Insight Model Year 2010 4 cyl, 1.3L, Auto(AV-S7), Regular Gasoline User Average: 49.7(14 vehicles) EPA Combined: 41
3.   Geo Metro XFI Model Years 1990-1994 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline User Average: 49.4(12 vehicles) EPA Combined: 46
4.   Toyota Prius Model Year 2010 4 cyl, 1.8L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular Gasoline User Average: 48.6(87 vehicles) EPA Combined: 50
5.   Chevrolet Metro Model Year 1999 3 cyl, 1.0L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline User Average: 48.4(10 vehicles) EPA Combined: 37
6.   Volkswagen Jetta Wagon Model Years 2002-2003 4 cyl, 1.9L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel User Average: 48.2(22 vehicles) EPA Combined: 39
7.   Honda Civic Hybrid Model Years 2003-2005 4 cyl, 1.3L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline User Average: 47.8(20 vehicles) EPA Combined: 41
8.   Honda Civic HB VX Model Years 1992-1995 4 cyl, 1.5L, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline User Average: 47.6(11 vehicles) EPA Combined: 43
9.   Volkswagen Golf Model Years 2000-2003 4 cyl, 1.9L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel User Average: 47.0(50 vehicles) EPA Combined: 38
10.   Volkswagen New Beetle Model Years 1998-20034 cyl, 1.9L, Manual 5-spd, Diesel User Average: 46.2(47 vehicles) EPA Combined: 38
Vehicles are ranked based on fuel economy records provided by our users through our Your MPG feature. Vehicles are only ranked if ten or more drivers submitted fuel economy estimates. If a model has variants that are nearly identical (e.g., same number of cylinders, engine displacement, transmission, fuel type, and EPA combined fuel economy rating), those records are combined and averaged. Variants that are not similar enough to be combined are included under "similar models" if they would have otherwise made the list. Only the most efficient configuration of a particular model is presented for a given rank. This list is updated weekly as new data are submitted by Your MPG members.

Tags: , ,

Study finds 1 in 4 Pa. Drivers don't know rules -- Alarming!

by AnneFleming 3. June 2010 04:34
Ladies, read this compelling article by Jon Schmitz. We have not scored well regarding the rules of engagement, and the laws, of the road. Wow! Unlike the folks in this article, I vote we go to driver's education at ages 16, 36, 56 and 76. Being tested four times in the average life might keep us abit sharper and less nonchalant. And, it might just save lives. My score -- an 85. I have room for improvement. Read on...
Wednesday, June 02, 2010

This might come as no surprise, but there's a 1 in 4 chance that the person ahead of you in traffic is clueless.

So suggests a study by GMAC Insurance, which administered a 20-question written test to more than 5,000 drivers nationwide, with questions pulled from actual tests administered by state motor vehicle agencies.

Pennsylvania did not shower itself in glory, finishing 39th among states with an average score of 75.8 percent, below the 76.2 percent national average. Possibly more dismaying is that 25.3 percent of Pennsylvania respondents flunked the exam.

With 8.7 million licensed drivers in the state, that means there could be as many as 2.2 million Keystone State motorists who don't know whether to yield or wind their watches.

It was the sixth year GMAC administered the test, and this year's results showed that as a nation, we're skidding. The national average score fell by 0.4 percentage points from the preceding year.

Wade Bontrager, a senior vice president for the company, said although the drop was small, it was discouraging. "We've been evangelizing this message for six years now. ... It's not getting better," he said.

The company decided to test drivers because of the volume of accident reports and claims in which lack of driving knowledge was a contributing factor, he said.

"In so many of these (accidents), it's little things that caused them. Someone followed too closely or failed to yield," Mr. Bontrager said.

Nationally, 18.4 percent of the 5,202 survey respondents failed to score the 70 percent needed to pass the exam. That translates to 38 million drivers nationwide who would flunk if they were required to take a written test, the insurer said.

Kansas drivers had the best average score, 82.3 percent. New Yorkers ranked last, at 70 percent.

The Northeast had the lowest average test score (74.9 percent) and the highest failure rate (25.1 percent). The Midwest had the highest average test score (77.5 percent) and the lowest failure rate (11.9 percent).

Men outscored women 78.1 percent to 74.4, and had a lower failure rate, 18.1 percent to 24 percent for females.

"It's very concerning," Mr. Bontrager said of Pennsylvania's failure rate. "Even the good states have a lot of people failing this test. They all should be doing better."

"It is alarming," agreed Bevi Powell, spokeswoman for AAA East Central, based in Pittsburgh. But she added that "more crashes happen due to inattention than a lack of knowledge."

Most Pennsylvania drivers aren't required to be tested for knowledge once they've passed the written exam to receive their learner's permits. On that test, they must correctly answer at least 15 of the 18 questions to pass.

The state has administered about 430,000 knowledge tests for car and motorcycle applicants since last July, with a pass-fail ratio of about 50-50, said Danielle Klinger, spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.

Drivers who accumulate six points for moving violations are given a special exam and must pass it within 30 days to avoid a license suspension.

Others might be required to be retested if they are diagnosed with an impairment that affects their driving ability, Ms. Klinger said. Medical professionals are required to report such diagnoses to the state.

Ms. Powell noted that AAA and other agencies offer an 8-hour refresher course on driving rules, and those 55 and older who take the course are eligible for 5 percent reductions in their car insurance premiums.

AAA does not support mandatory retesting of older motorists, and Ms. Powell said she was unaware of any state that requires it.

Mr. Bontrager said GMAC wasn't advocating that states require periodic retesting. He said he considered it a matter of personal responsibility for drivers to brush up on their knowledge, and to realize that the value of such knowledge was improved safety, not just a step toward getting a license.

After the test results are announced each year, millions go to www.nationaldriverstest.com to take the test, he said. "If some of those people get better as a result, and avoid getting into an accident, we will have succeeded."

PennDOT's drivers manual also is available online and has 183 sample test questions at www.dmv.state.pa.us/drivers_manual/pa_driversman.shtml.

Jon Schmitz: jschmitz@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1868. Visit "The Roundabout," the Post-Gazette's transportation blog, at post-gazette.com
Follow Jon on Twitter at www.twitter.com/pgtraffic


Tags: , , ,

Breakthrough in Women's Heath and Wellness

by AnneFleming 2. June 2010 13:09

Do you have feelings of inadequacy?
Do you suffer from shyness?
Do you sometimes wish you were more assertive?
Do you suffer exhaustion from the day to day grind?
       
If you answered yes to any of these questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist about Margaritas.
       
Margaritas are the safe, natural way to feel better and more confident about yourself and your actions. Margaritas can help ease you out of your shyness and let you tell the world that you're ready and willing to do just about anything. You will notice the benefits of Margaritas almost immediately and with a regiment of regular doses you can overcome any obstacles that prevent you from living the life you want to live.
       
Shyness and awkwardness will be a thing of the past and you will discover many talents you never knew you had. Stop hiding and start living, with Margaritas. Margaritas may not be right for everyone. Women who are pregnant or nursing should not use Margaritas. However, women who wouldn't mind nursing or becoming pregnant are encouraged to try it.
       
Side effects may include:

        - Dizziness
        - Nausea
        - Vomiting
        - Incarceration
        - Erotic lustfulness
        - Loss of motor control
        - Loss of clothing
        - Loss of money
        - Loss of virginity
        - Table dancing
        - Headache
        - Dehydration
        - Dry mouth
        - And a desire to sing Karaoke
       
Warnings:

        * The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you are whispering when you are not.
        * The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to tell your friends over and over again that you love them.
        * The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to think you can sing.
        * The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you can logically converse with members of the opposite sex without spitting.
       
Please share this with other women who may need Margaritas.

Ladies, I did not write this, but I wish I coud take credit.. all hail to whomever wrote it and to my closet-blogger sister, Sheila.

Do not take this new drug while driving or even thinking about it.

Drive Your Bargain,

 Anne

www.twitter.com/womendrivers

Tags: , , , ,

Blog
Archive

../inc-sub/